featured
Whistleblower: GHF Is Helping Israel Create Gaza Concentration Camps // GrayZone News
Grayzone News | Trusted Newsmaker
Whistleblower Claims: GHF and the Creation of Biometric Camps in Gaza
A whistleblower has raised alarming claims about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), suggesting that its aid operations may double as a surveillance and control mechanism aligned with Israeli military objectives. What appear to be food distribution hubs may, in fact, be part of a broader plan to collect biometric data, monitor populations, and ultimately funnel Palestinians into controlled camps.
From Aid to Surveillance
The transcript describes “secure distribution sites” equipped with high-definition cameras. At least one in six of these cameras reportedly has facial recognition capabilities, designed to capture biometrics from Palestinians lining up for food. According to the whistleblower, Safe Reach Solutions—GHF’s operational partner—employs intelligence analysts rather than humanitarian workers, indicating a military rather than a relief-driven mission.
Biometric Databases in the Making
Every aid-seeker passing through narrow, deliberately constructed entry points is scanned and logged. This information, the whistleblower alleges, feeds into biometric databases containing mugshots and profiles of “military-aged males.” These profiles can then be used by Israeli intelligence for targeting or monitoring. In this telling, food aid becomes bait for data extraction.
Planning Documents and Foreshadowing
The Washington Post previously reported that planning documents acknowledged public skepticism and prepared counter-narratives in case the operation was accused of resembling “concentration camps.” The documents even anticipated comparisons to Blackwater, the notorious private military contractor implicated in abuses in Iraq. These warnings now seem eerily prescient in light of current revelations.
Forced Displacement Through Infrastructure
Distribution hubs are deliberately located far from populations in need, forcing families to travel great distances. The whistleblower calls this “luring” and “displacement,” designed not for efficient humanitarian relief but for crowd control. Entrances were built small not by chance but to align with biometric camera framing, proving intentional design for surveillance.
The Long-Term Agenda: Camps in the South
According to the transcript, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and other officials have floated plans for a “humanitarian city” in southern Gaza, effectively a mass internment zone. The whistleblower claims that Site One—a massive aid hub—is being expanded as the foundation of “Phase Three”: relocation of the Gaza population into a controlled transit camp. Funding, reportedly sourced from the U.S. State Department and unnamed European donors, has been secured through December, fueling ongoing construction.
The “Humanitarian Transit Area”
Satellite imagery reportedly shows expansion at distribution sites, particularly Site One. This facility is described as large enough to house the operations of all four aid sites combined. Its purpose: to process Palestinians displaced from northern Gaza, holding them in a concentrated zone before pushing them out of Gaza altogether. This is framed not as a temporary relief solution but as an engineered stage of forced transfer.
Blueprint for Crimes Against Humanity?
The transcript links these developments to accusations of crimes against humanity. Analysts and legal experts argue that biometric confinement and coerced relocation amount to modern concentration camps. The whistleblower emphasizes that this is not theoretical—the plan is already in execution, with construction underway and funding streams confirmed.
The whistleblower’s account paints GHF’s mission not as neutral humanitarian relief but as part of a militarized apparatus of surveillance, displacement, and control. With biometric tracking, forced relocation, and camp construction progressing under the guise of aid, the claims suggest Gaza’s humanitarian crisis may be manipulated into a system of population management unprecedented in scale. Whether framed as “relief hubs” or “humanitarian cities,” the effect is the same: confinement under watchful eyes, and the erasure of independent Palestinian life.
//
