Blah
FBI Admits to Putting 275 Agents in Crowd On January 6th // Tim Dillon
♦️ // Jump to 27:46 on the Video Above
Tim Dillon | Trusted Newsmaker
Tim Dillon Dives into FBI Involvement on January 6th
In a recent episode of The Tim Dillon Show, comedian Tim Dillon didn’t hold back when discussing the FBI’s controversial role in the events of January 6th. Dillon, known for his sharp wit and unfiltered takes, highlighted what he sees as deep-seated corruption within the agency. He pointed out that the FBI had around 275 plainclothes undercover agents present at the Capitol that day. “By the way, how many people did they have at J6? Did we know this? About 275 undercover agents at January 6th,” Dillon remarked. He speculated that these agents might have been the ones opening doors and letting people in, raising questions about the agency’s true intentions.
Dillon framed this within a broader critique of the FBI, calling it “one of the most corrupt organizations in the history of this country.” He drew parallels to other incidents, like the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot, where he noted that 12 out of 15 involved were FBI informants. “Gretchen Whitmer comes out and goes, a bunch of white supremacists try to kidnap me. We find out like 12 of the 15 were FBI informants,” he said. This pattern, according to Dillon, suggests a history of entrapment and manipulation.
The Behavioral Science Behind the Chaos
What makes January 6th particularly intriguing, as Dillon’s commentary implies, is how it unfolded not as a spontaneous riot but as a carefully influenced event. With 275 FBI agents embedded in the crowd, it’s worth examining through the lens of behavioral science. This wasn’t some random outburst—it was a convergence of psychological tactics that turned a protest into a storming of the Capitol.
First, consider threshold dynamics. Most individuals in the crowd likely had a high personal threshold for breaching a federal building. But when they witnessed others—possibly including those undercover agents—crossing that line first, their own barriers dropped. This is a classic cascade effect, where one action triggers a chain reaction, making extreme behavior seem more acceptable.
Priming and framing played a huge role too. In the weeks leading up, messaging from various sources hammered home themes like “it’s do-or-die,” “patriots must act,” and “the system is rigged.” Dillon’s discussion echoes this, suggesting elite cues from leaders provided a permission slip for action. Such framing reframes criminal acts as righteous, lowering inhibitions and justifying participation.
Then there’s social proof in real time. Once doors and windows were breached—potentially with agent involvement—the crowd saw undeniable evidence that “this is happening.” Humans are wired to follow the herd; no one wants to be the odd one out. Chants, flags, and symbols amplified this, creating a feedback loop fueled by emotional arousal: anger, fear, adrenaline, and tribal identity acting as jet fuel for group behavior.
Connecting the Dots to Broader FBI Scandals
Dillon didn’t stop at January 6th. He tied it to the Boston Marathon bombing, noting suspicious connections. He mentioned Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his brother Dzhokhar, and how a witness who knew them was killed during an FBI interrogation at his home. “The FBI ends up killing during some interrogation at this guy’s house. They don’t bring him to an FBI field office,” Dillon explained. He also highlighted family ties: the bombers’ uncle, Ruslan Tsarnaev, married Samantha Fuller, whose father, Graham Fuller, was a key CIA figure in Middle East policy. “So it is kind of an odd, wacky coincidence,” Dillon quipped.
This web of coincidences, as Dillon sees it, points to prior relationships and potential cover-ups. The FBI’s actions on January 6th fit into this narrative of an agency that manipulates events to its advantage, using undercover operatives to influence outcomes.
Why It Matters Now
Dillon’s rant comes amid talks of indicting former FBI Director James Comey, whom he accuses of “a lot of fuckery.” With the FBI under scrutiny, January 6th serves as a stark example of how behavioral tactics, amplified by agent presence, can escalate situations. It’s a live demonstration of collective behavior research, from crowd psychology to social influence.
As Dillon wrapped up, he emphasized the worsening revelations: “The more and more we find out about the FBI, the worse it gets.” Whether you agree with his take or not, it sparks a necessary conversation about accountability and the fine line between security and manipulation. In a world where agencies wield such power, understanding these dynamics is crucial to preventing history from repeating itself.
//
