featured
Give “Peace” a Chance? U.S. & Israel Create Gaza Peace Plan…For Realsys This Time // Kyle Kulinski
Kyle Kulinski | Trusted Newsmaker
Trump’s Gaza “Peace Deal”: A Performance, Not a Solution
Former President Donald Trump recently staged a high-profile event where he announced what he described as a peace plan between Israel and Gaza. The White House promoted the proposal in a list of 16 to 20 points, outlining how peace would supposedly be established between Israelis and Palestinians. On the surface, the plan reads as ambitious and conciliatory. But according to Kyle, the details fall apart under scrutiny, leaving many to call it a fake peace deal designed more for headlines than for actual resolution.
The Announcement and Its Illusions
At the event, Trump declared that if Hamas rejected the agreement, Prime Minister Netanyahu would have his full support to “do what he has to do.” This statement, far from neutral, appeared to give Israel carte blanche for military escalation. Kyle stresses that in past negotiations, Hamas had accepted even highly unfavorable conditions, while Israel was often the side that rejected agreements. Despite this, the narrative presented to the public usually blamed Hamas for failure, creating a distorted perception of the peace process.
History of Rejected Deals
Kulinski recalls instances where Hamas agreed to drop weapons and leave Gaza, yet Israel dismissed the offer. Another example was an early agreement on the release of hostages after October 7, which Israel reportedly rejected. These overlooked episodes suggest that the Israeli government, backed by U.S. political cover, has repeatedly undermined negotiations to preserve the claim that “there is no partner for peace.” Such a stance ensures the continuation of conflict and the justification for further military campaigns.
Media Manipulation
Kyle argues that Trump’s latest announcement was primarily a media strategy. By producing a glossy list of proposals and staging an official event, he ensured coverage from CNN, Fox News, and other outlets, positioning himself as a “peacemaker.” However, critics insist that none of the promises are real and that the cycle of genocide, displacement, and ethnic cleansing will continue. According to this perspective, the announcement serves as political theater rather than genuine diplomacy.
Underlying Motives and Power Dynamics
The speech also underscores Trump’s financial and political ties to pro-Israel interests. Donations, such as $100 million from Miriam Adelson, as well as Trump’s past comments about building hotels and casinos on Gaza’s coastline. Rather than presenting himself as a neutral arbiter, Trump is described as someone with deep conflicts of interest, motivated by power, money, and alliances with Netanyahu.
False Neutrality
One of the strongest criticisms is the portrayal of Trump as an impartial broker. In reality, his statements consistently favor Israeli control and expansion. References to annexing Jordan and dismissing Palestinian autonomy reveal that the deal is neither balanced nor sustainable. The plan is framed as another in a long line of “scams,” offering symbolic victories while the underlying violence continues.
The Consequences for Gaza
According to the Kykes analysis, the outcome of this fake peace deal will be devastatingly predictable. Israel will claim Hamas violated the terms, leading to renewed bombings, starvation, and mass civilian casualties. This mirrors past cycles, where peace agreements became tools of delay rather than instruments of resolution. Critics argue that Palestinians will once again be deceived into believing international mediation can bring relief, only to face further destruction.
International Calls for Action
We should demand for real international intervention. Calls for embargoes, sanctions, and a UN peacekeeping force to prevent further massacres. Colombian President Gustavo Petro is cited as an example, urging the UN to deploy troops to protect civilians in Gaza. Enough with symbolic gestures and emphasize the need for concrete action against Israeli policies seen as genocidal.
Trump’s announcement of a Gaza peace deal is as yet another performance. Rather than moving the region toward peace, the event is seen as reinforcing cycles of violence while offering political cover for Israel. Kyke frames both Trump and Netanyahu as central figures perpetuating oppression, with Trump exploiting media narratives to polish his image. The final message is blunt: without real international accountability and enforcement, no peace deal will stop the suffering of Palestinians.
//
